We can use our suffering to glorify God. So we can offer up our suffering in union with Jesus on the Cross.
Monday, August 10, 2015
Taking up our cross
Beautiful homily by Fr. Shroff. Jesus said we must die to self and follow me. Jesus transforms our human suffering. And makes it holy.
We can use our suffering to glorify God. So we can offer up our suffering in union with Jesus on the Cross.
We can use our suffering to glorify God. So we can offer up our suffering in union with Jesus on the Cross.
Wednesday, August 5, 2015
Monday, August 3, 2015
Saint Ignatius, St. Martha, etc.
Four more beautiful homilies from Fr. Dennis.
Saint Ignatius of Loyola
July 30, 2015
Saint Martha
July 28, 2015
Friday, July 10, 2015
Vocations/St. Augustine Zhao Rong and Companions
Two beautiful homilies this week from Fr. Shroff:
Priestly vocations. We don't only want many vocations, we want Holy vocations.
St. Augustine Zhao Rong and Companions. Martyrs.
Wednesday, July 8, 2015
The crack lets the light in
Excellent article in today's National Post by Ray Pennings of Cardus:
Are Edmund Burke's "little platoons" -- family, faith, community -- on the way out? Pennings argues that just the opposite is happening.
"...Philosopher James K.A. Smith infers from this historical aberration the emergence of what he calls “cracks in the secular” — fissures or fault lines where the kind of totalizing secularism required for “exclusive humanism” becomes socially unsustainable. “What if an increasingly aggressive secularism (coming especially from secular ‘elites’) is itself a defensive measure, a kind of last gasp of a worldview that feels frustrated and even threatened?” Smith asks in a recent issue of Comment magazine, which he edits for Cardus.
“What if secularism is loudest precisely because it is a final cry before it is unveiled as implausible and unsustainable? What if secularism has its doubts and is just trying to cover it up by pursuing its agenda all the more aggressively lest (secularist elites) have to consider the alternative?”
As a distinguished academic, Smith posits rather than proclaims. And of course it is possible to read our present age differently from the direction he and Taylor seem to see it heading. But there is outside evidence to support the appearance of cracks in the secular. Supreme Court of Canada decisions in 2015 on religious freedom — Loyola and Saguenay — reset the relationship between the state and religious institutions. It did so by affirming that the state’s “neutrality” requires a fostering of religious diversity, not its extinguishment.
Such affirmation can rightly be seen as positively contributing to a healthier understanding of a more robust sense of religious freedom. Its logical implication is that in our evolving post-secular society, exclusive secularism is finally being seen for what it is: a worldview that is making as absolute a truth claim as any other and therefore does not deserve a place of privilege in a public square protected by the “neutral” state. Continuing down this trajectory allows us to imagine a more open, healthier debate in the public square regarding the balance of freedom and order..."Pennings ends with this:
"So, farewell to Burke’s little platoons? And to the social conservatism that gives them life? I argue quite the opposite. Look for them to make a comeback in our emerging post-secular society."
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Monday, July 6, 2015
Whatshisname gets his just desserts
DISCLAIMER - The depiction of the the device commonly known as a BBQ is by no means intended as a put down to the importance of this appliance in its usual application used for cooking sustenance. Instead its use in the above depiction, is to identify an alternate method of enjoying the idea of imagining the disposal of the evil creature known by numerous names such as the Father of Lies, Beelzebub, Lucifer, King of Hell, Prince of Darkness, the Evil Spirit, etc. It is the express intention of the artist that every method of making fun of, or laughing at, or generally causing extended periods of uproarious laughter against this creature be used frequently to ensure his continued and assured marginalization in his influence on good and worthy creatures. Henceforth the author wishes to refer to this abominable creature as Spit Guy OR take-your-pitchfork-and-shove-it-up-your ___.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)